In short
The Teardown is a $197 review of one website that finds the specific places visitors are leaving without becoming leads. You send one URL and answer six short fields about your business. Three business days later you get back a ranked list of what is costing you leads, most expensive problem first, with the fix for each one written out. Every Teardown is built against your live site and your named competitors, then edited personally by Brice Horrigan before it is sent, so you are not receiving the output of a scanner. There is no call, no discovery meeting, and no proposal attached to the back of it. One price, $197, and the findings are yours whether you ever hire anyone or not.
$197
Fixed, one price
3 days
Business days to delivery
0
Calls required
1
Person reviews it before it sends
The people who buy this all describe the same thing. The site gets visitors. The phone does not ring, the form does not fire, and the calendar stays empty. So they buy more traffic, which makes the number at the top go up and the number that matters stay flat. A website not converting is almost never a volume problem. It is a specific break on a specific page, and until somebody names which one, every month of spend runs through the same hole.
With the fix for each one. Not a 40 page report dump you will never open twice.
No second invoice, no upsell buried inside the deliverable, no proposal stapled to the back. Three business days from the time you submit your URL. No call at any point, which is the part most people ask about first.
You do not book a slot, you do not sit through a discovery meeting, and nothing is pitched at you before you get what you paid for. If you want to talk once you have read the findings, ask. Nothing is withheld until you do.
Once the way a first time visitor reads it, once the way a search engine and an AI assistant read it.
no1iscoming.com was rebuilt on exactly what the teardown checks for. This is the first full week of data after that launch, published with the starting number attached rather than as a percentage on its own.
Google Analytics 4 · active users
7
before
11
after
+57.1%
change
Active users, Friday 28 August against Friday 21 August.
One week after launch · single-day comparison
What changed in that week
Read this for what it is. Eleven users is a small number, one Friday against another Friday is a single-day comparison, and a week is not long enough to separate a trend from normal variance. It is early signal that the structural work took, not proof of a durable lift. The honest version of this claim gets republished at ninety days with a fuller window, whichever way it goes.
You are not getting leads from your website, and you already have people landing on it.